THIRD SLIP

thirdslip.com
Cricket, by the numbers


How good is your favourite one-day batsman?
A new perspective on batting combines different measures of a player's worth into a single index.
Part II: The Contributing Average


How good is your favourite ODI batsman? While a number of different measures of a batsman's worth have been devised, there are also problems with each of them.

  • The Batting Average (BA) is improved when a batsman remains not-out at the end of his team's innings; as a result the likelihood of such a boost to one's average is far greater for a middle-order bat like Michael Bevan than an opener like Adam Gilchrist.

  • In a game where the speed at which runs are scored is crucial, two identical scores made in contrasting styles are hardly comparable. A quick 40+ from a late order batsman on the slog is a plus, whereas a slow 40+ from a top-order batsman actually hurts the team's chances. However, this is not necessarily the case either. A team chasing a sub-200 total would be reasonably well served by the later innings too. The Strike Rate (SR), a measure of this critical difference, is not reflected in the batting averages.

  • A third measure - one that partially offsets the skew from not-outs - is Runs made per Innings (RPI). This may be a fairer measure of a batsman's contribution than the average, but in a time-limited game, this measure is unfair to lower-order batsman who do not have the same opportunity to score runs as those batting higher.

In this column, we offer an integrated index (which we call the "Contributing Average") that balances the effects of individual measures, and may therefore present a more accurate measure of a batsman's worth. In Part I (this part, see link to Part II at the end of this page), the limitations of the existing measures are first discussed; Part II will include a detailed presentation of our new measure. Note that the data discussed below are limited to those players who have accumulated 2000 or more runs, roughly 50 matches for a top-flight player. The data are current to match #2086, played on 22 January 2004 between India and Australia in the VB Series.

A. Batting Average

This is the most accessible of all measures, although as noted above, it suffers from the impact of Not-outs.. Assuming that no more than five players in a given team would likely compete for top honors within the squad, and knowing that two of these are almost certainly the openers, we would expect 40% of the top-ranked players to be openers. However, as we see from the table below (Top 20 batsman, by Batting Average), the rankings are loaded in favour of non-openers, and the likelihood of remaining not-out (not-outs/innings; see under the 'Not out Percentage' column shown as 'NO-%') is typically much higher for the middle order players. Bevan, Kluesener and Martyn have very high Not Out % figures.

Top Batsmen - By Average


 SNo  Batsman         Ctry  Mat  Inns  NO   Runs    HS  NO-%  Avge

  1 Bevan M.G         Aus  226  189   66   6700   108  34.9  54.47
  2 Zaheer Abbas      Pak   62   60    6   2572   123  10.0  47.63
  3 Richards I.V.A    Win  187  167   24   6721   189  14.4  47.00
  4 Tendulkar S.R     Ind  324  315   31  12878   186   9.8  45.35
  5 Greenidge C.G     Win  128  127   13   5134   133  10.2  45.04
  6 Kallis J.H        Saf  185  176   31   6497   125  17.6  44.81
  7 Jones D.M         Aus  164  161   25   6068   145  15.5  44.62
  8 Dippenaar H.H     Saf   67   56    9   2066   110  16.1  43.96
  9 Klusener L        Saf  154  124   46   3381   103  37.1  43.35
 10 Ganguly S.C       Ind  240  232   20   9133   183   8.6  43.08
 11 Yousuf Youhana    Pak  158  150   23   5449   141  15.3  42.91
 12 Lara B.C          Win  225  220   23   8443   169  10.5  42.86
 13 Hayden M.L        Aus   85   81   11   2959   146  13.6  42.27
 14 Ponting R.T       Aus  191  187   26   6763   145  13.9  42.01
 15 Martyn D.R        Aus  138  118   38   3346   144  32.2  41.83
 16 Javed Miandad     Pak  233  218   41   7381   119  18.8  41.70
 17 Haynes D.L        Win  238  237   28   8648   152  11.8  41.38
 18 Kirsten G         Saf  185  185   19   6798   188  10.3  40.95
 19 Knight N.V        Eng  100  100   10   3636   125  10.0  40.40
 20 Chappell G.S      Aus   74   72   14   2331   138  19.4  40.19
 21 Gayle C.H         Win   84   82    3   3160   153   3.7  40.00
 22 Marsh G.R         Aus  117  115    6   4357   126   5.2  39.97
 23 Dravid R          Ind  219  200   25   6912   153  12.5  39.50
 24 Fairbrother N.H   Eng   75   71   18   2092   113  25.4  39.47
 25 Waugh M.E         Aus  244  236   20   8500   173   8.5  39.35

Michael Bevan's pre-eminence in this table is certainly in part due to the not-outs against his name, but it must be understood that even with a more average not out rate, say 15-16% amounting to 37 not-outs, his average would be around 44, still good enough to appear in this list.

B. Runs Per Innings

This measure negates the Not-Out factor; it is determined by dividing the number of runs scored by the number of innings played. As noted earlier, this weighs slightly against the middle order batsmen who might not have the time to play longer innings, but it is nonethelesss a useful indication of a batsman's effectiveness. The current Top 25 list by this measure is as follows:.

Top Batsmen - By RPI


SNo  Batsman            Ctry  Mat Inns  NOs  Runs   RPI

  1 Zaheer Abbas         Pak   62   60    6  2572  42.87
  2 Tendulkar S.R        Ind  324  315   31 12878  40.88
  3 Greenidge C.G        Win  128  127   13  5134  40.43
  4 Richards I.V.A       Win  187  167   24  6721  40.25
  5 Ganguly S.C          Ind  240  232   20  9133  39.37
  6 Gayle C.H            Win   84   82    3  3160  38.54
  7 Lara B.C             Win  225  220   23  8443  38.38
  8 Marsh G.R            Aus  117  115    6  4357  37.89
  9 Jones D.M            Aus  164  161   25  6068  37.69
 10 Kallis J.H           Saf  185  176   31  6497  36.91
 11 Dippenaar H.H        Saf   67   56    9  2066  36.89
 12 Kirsten G            Saf  185  185   19  6798  36.75
 13 Hayden M.L           Aus   85   81   11  2959  36.53
 14 Haynes D.L           Win  238  237   28  8648  36.49
 15 Knight N.V           Eng  100  100   10  3636  36.36
 16 Yousuf Youhana       Pak  158  150   23  5449  36.33
 17 Ponting R.T          Aus  191  187   26  6763  36.17
 18 Saeed Anwar          Pak  247  244   19  8823  36.16
 19 Waugh M.E            Aus  244  236   20  8500  36.02
 20 Trescothick M.E      Eng   75   75    3  2700  36.00
 21 Bevan M.G            Aus  226  189   66  6700  35.45
 22 Gooch G.A            Eng  125  122    6  4290  35.16
 23 Gilchrist A.C        Aus  183  177    6  6165  34.83
 24 Sidhu N.S            Ind  136  127    8  4414  34.76
 25 Smith R.A            Eng   71   70    8  2419  34.56

The negation of the not-outs is clearly evident in this list. More than half the top slots are held by openers. But the downside - that lower order batsman have less opportunity for accumulation - is also plainly seen. Not a single player on this list has had much playing time at #5 or lower. It is testimony to Michael Bevan's success at this form of the game that he ranks high enough to be in this list, despite this handicap.

C. Strike Rate

This statistic is made available nowadays quite frequently. For many older matches, however, the number of balls faced by batsmen was not routinely recorded, and this makes comparisons less direct. Using a number of analysis techniques, however, it has been possible to make good estimates of 'balls faced' for scoreboards that do not contain such data. These techniques can be verified using more recent scoreboards for which detailed data are available. With such corrections made, the current top 25 batsman are as follows:

Top Batsmen - By Strike Rate


SNo Batsman             Ctry  Mat    Runs  Balls    S/R

  1 Shahid Afridi        Pak  176    3887   3825  101.62
  2 Sehwag V             Ind   81    2585   2725   94.86
  3 Gilchrist A.C        Aus  183    6165   6575   93.76
  4 Kapil Dev N          Ind  225    3783   4146   91.24
  5 Klusener L           Saf  154    3381   3731   90.62
  6 Jayasuriya S.T       Slk  307    9166  10309   88.91
  7 Richards I.V.A       Win  187    6721   7581   88.66
  8 Wasim Akram          Pak  356    3717   4224   88.00
  9 Tendulkar S.R        Ind  324   12878  14869   86.61
 10 Trescothick M.E      Eng   75    2700   3136   86.10
 11 Cairns C.L           Nzl  180    4272   5181   82.46
 12 Gibbs H.H            Saf  138    4522   5506   82.13
 13 Lehmann D.S          Aus  100    2714   3311   81.97
 14 Moin Khan            Pak  200    3061   3765   81.30
 15 Rhodes J.N           Saf  245    5935   7310   81.19
 16 de Silva P.A         Slk  308    9284  11497   80.75
 17 Saeed Anwar          Pak  247    8823  10931   80.72
 18 Martyn D.R           Aus  138    3346   4181   80.03
 19 Ijaz Ahmed           Pak  250    6566   8203   80.04
 20 Zaheer Abbas         Pak   62    2572   3216   79.98
 21 Lara B.C             Win  225    8443  10641   79.34
 22 Gayle C.H            Win   84    3160   3991   79.18
 23 Abdur Razzaq         Pak  153    2952   3799   77.70
 24 Kaluwitharana R.S    Slk  186    3708   4769   77.75
 25 Boucher M.V          Saf  160    2062   2655   77.66

As we would expect, this list is dominated by great attacking batsmen. Also, with the definite turn of the game towards explosive starts following Sri Lanka's famous World Cup campaign in 1996, openers from more recent times who can attack the bowling right from the first over are found in abundance in this list.

D. Contributing Average

There is a striking element to these measures, when each of them is examined individually. In the first two cases, we were able to predict the batting positions of players who should be on each list; the first had a disproportionate number of lower-order bats and the second was dominated by openers. Our third list - of fast scoring batsmen - is a less predictable one, but this one too is problematic. It treats those with small and large career totals alike, counting only the speed at which their runs were made. Such an assessment is clearly unfair to players who have maintained their striking power over long careers.

This completes our discussion of the current measures. In the second part of this article, we present our new measure - the "Contributing Average" that attempts to overcome the disadvantages discussed here in each of these lists.

Y. Anantha Narayanan & Ashwin Mahesh
January 2004.

Part II: The ODI Contributing Batting Average


© Hallmark Software Pvt. Ltd., all rights reserved.
Click here to learn more about thirdslip.com